White House Correspondents' Dinner: Can Future Events Be Safer?

On Saturday night, a heavily armed shooter was able to easily access areas close to the ballroom where the White House Correspondents’ Dinner was being held, leading to a rushed evacuation of the president and senior officials and a hectic, scary evening for attendees. Why wasn’t the event safe from this kind of a situation? It’s a fair question, but perhaps the wrong one. The more realistic inquiry is whether this kind of event can be made safer. This coming summer, the United States will host two major multicity events: celebrations for the 250th anniversary of America’s founding and the World Cup. Both are highly complex efforts, attracting large domestic and international audiences, including political leaders. In two years, Los Angeles will host the Summer Olympics. White House Chief of Staff Susie Wiles is convening a meeting this week with various officials to discuss security at events that the president attends. How should we think about safety at these kinds of large gatherings going forward? Shane Harris: The Correspondents’ Dinner was a security success* For the past several years, I have worked with the public and private sectors to support what the safety industry calls mega-event planning—for big sporting events such as the Olympics, for example, but also smaller gatherings such as industry conventions or local concerts. I run a program at Harvard that does the same kind of work. I’ll let you in on a secret: In this kind of event planning, the realistic guiding principle is not to eliminate risk but to reduce it as much as possible.